Krill Bill: new-age fad contributing to overfishing, food web destruction and climate change

I should be studying hard for an exam on marine biodiversity on Tuesday and finishing a report on copepod (zooplankton) populations in the Hopkins River. But after seeing a tweet from the Blue Planet Society (@seasaver) about a newly accepted paper on Antarctic krill fishing, I had to get in on the debate.


As basic background, krill is a shrimp-like marine crustacean near the bottom of the food chain, feeding on phytoplankton and operating as a suitable food source for much larger sea creatures. Concerns about the impact of krill harvesting for human consumption have been around for some time but academic debate has been somewhat limited, for various reasons including the usual issue of research funding.

Parker and PH Tyedmers wrote on the issues surrounding claims of krill overfishing in Environmental Science and Technology journal, in a paper titled Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Products Derived from Wild-Caught Antarctic Krill (Euphausia superba). 

In their own words, their aim was to “apply life cycle assessment to measure the contributions of krill meal, oil, and omega-3 capsules to global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, energy use, and biotic resource use”.

Krill meal and krill oil tablets, along with the more common omega-3 supplements, have become a trendy way to increase omega-3 in the diets of gym junkies and hipsters but are worryingly catching on further. Anecdotally at least, this trend would have increase the amount of krill being sourced from the most reproductive areas of the  Southern Ocean and seas around Japan and contribute to climate change through fossil fuel use.

Parker and Tyedmers found, in studying Norwegian company Aker BioMarine’s krill fishery, that about “190 litres of fuel was burned per tonne of raw krill landed, markedly higher than fuel inputs to reduction fisheries targeting other species. In contrast, the biotic resource use associated with extracting krill is relatively low compared to that of other reduction fisheries.”

When you consider krill is a major food source for whales, dolphins, penguins, and some types of squid and fish, growth in the human demand for krill should be of serious concern. On a personal level, I had a heated discussion last September with my sister – a very keen follower of new vitamin supplement trends – about the impact of increasing krill demand on the larger animals that feed on them.

It didn’t help that my argument at the time was short on published fact about the problem, so I had to concede I didn’t really the long-term effects of krill fishing on large mammals or whether reproductive rates could keep up with human demand.

But obviously, as a marine biologist in training, getting the facts on the problem is more important just proving a point: it’s a chance to have a say and further publicise the potential issues overfishing has on a food web as complex as that based on krill.


About oceanicexplorer

Posted on April 14, 2012, in conservation, fishing, research, science and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Thanks for pointing out an often overlooked problem. And it’s not just the way humans are increasingly harvesting biomass such as krill for their own consumption. More and more, people are looking to the sea to feed farm animals and, ironically, farmed fish.

    • exactly, farmed fish such as salmon in the US are being fed fishmeal sourced off the coasts of poorer South American countries. And feeding farm animals biomass is just insane

  2. I’d be keen to hear any other opinions on the krill or general aquaculture industry. From the number of views this post is getting, looks like a topical issue and one that should have further debate.
    I sat through a lecture last week which gave an alternate view to my comment above about feeding farmed animals krill/fishmeal: that the meat and dairy production gained from feeding cows, pigs and chickens fishmeal far outweighed the initial inputs. So to remove that option completely from farming would also seem like an extreme measure, particularly in third-world countries where other feed options may be more expensive or less viable.

  3. I think this is a really interesting subject to think about, and I personally agree with your view that we shouldn’t take too much of this resource because of how important it is for the food chain and ecosystem. This is especially relevant in the face of climate change and its potential impacts in the Antarctic – overexploitation of krill here could disrupt this key resource… which drives almost global ecosystems, when you get to the bottom of it all. This could only lead to further instability.
    Whilst studying marine biology myself I was also was completely horrified to learn about the huge amount of seafood caught to feed farmed animals (often unsustainably or with little population information therefore making risk of overexploitation greater). I’ve been vegetarian ever since…

    • climate change as you said is also a big driver of changers in the ecosystems occupied by krill. Warming and acidification of the ocean is going to harm zooplankton population growth rates and this goes up the chain to the whales that must intake massive amounts of krill daily to survive.

  1. Pingback: How krill affects fish, seal and whale populations « oceanicexplorer

  2. Pingback: 2012 in review, thanks for making it a great year! « oceanicexplorer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: